Chief Learning Officer magazine is a trademark of Mediatec Publishing Inc. All clomedia.com and Chief Learning Officer magazine content Copyright 2012 MediaTec Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved. It is illegal to copy, reproduce or publish any information contained on clomedia.com or in Chief Learning Officer magazine without express written permission from MediaTec Publishing Inc.
On our LinkedIn discussion group, we recently saw an interesting question from a group member in England. She asked, “Where does the management of your learning management system sit in your organization; in IT or HR?” The member adds that she’s heard valid arguments both ways.
I can certainly envision valid arguments for both. On the one hand, it makes sense for an LMS to reside in HR, as the CLO will likely be working with it on a daily basis. On the other hand, as any learning and development professional likely knows, an LMS is a complicated piece of software and the best department to administer it is probably IT. Even if the LMS doesn’t reside with IT, that department will probably be required to assist with its management fairly regularly.
This question saw a lot of response. Overwhelmingly, commenters came down on the side of the LMS residing in HR, perhaps not surprising for a discussion group consisting of people working in learning. But the responses did address this as a complex question.
One respondent spoke of the LMS in his organization beginning in HR, then moving out of it and then back into it when it was realized this move had been a mistake. He also specified that his organization has its LMS management outsourced and emphasized that IT is always consulted in decisions about LMS infrastructure. Another respondent spoke of the LMS in her organization beginning in IT, then moving over to HR “to reflect business case (training priorities) within security requirements. It’s a complicated relationship but over the last five years [has] evolved to [be] a supportive one.” Yet another respondent spoke of working in an organization where the LMS resided within IT and “this presented some serious problems in terms of contracts being negotiated and tools selected without the appropriate level of input [from] and partnership with the learning team.”
One respondent came right out and stated that “where the LMS resides is a multi-part question in reality.” He specified: “The hardware/software side should be in the hands of those most capable of keeping it up and running [IT]. Administration of the learning application, catalog management, reporting, course/content management, etc., is best in the hands of those who know learning.” Another respondent similarly stated, “It makes more sense to also have a partnership [between] HR and IT to get the full benefits of the system.”
So it seems the LMS shouldn’t really reside strictly with one or the other department, but rather requires collaboration between HR and IT to be properly administered. Perhaps the LMS’s true home is with HR but IT’s involvement here is fundamental.
CLOs, tell us, where does the LMS reside in your organization and why?
Daniel Margolis
Daniel Margolis is managing editor of Chief Learning Officer magazine. He is a graduate of North Carolina State University, and has been writing and editing professionally for more than 12 years, contributing content to publications such as Wax Poetics, XXL, Complex and AOL Digital City Chicago. Prior to joining MediaTec, he served as a staff editor on publications covering printing, machining, metal service centers and project management. He can be reached at dmargolis@CLOMedia.com.
Sections
Blog Content
- May 2012 (10)
- April 2012 (13)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (11)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (9)
- November 2011 (11)
- October 2011 (11)
- September 2011 (13)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (10)
- June 2011 (10)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (12)
- December 2010 (8)
- November 2010 (4)
Tags
alignment ASTD business acumen c-suite CEO classroom learning collaboration collaborative learning communication costs e-learning effectiveness efficiency forecasting forecasts gen-y generations gen x goal-setting goals governing bodies impact impact of learning informal learning innovation leadership leadership development learning delivery level 1 level 4 LMS metrics and measurement millennials organization goals outcomes prioritization ROI running learning like a business social learning social workforce society stakeholder stakeholders strategic alignment TDRP





Pingback: Tweets that mention Should the LMS Reside in IT or HR? -- Topsy.com
Pingback: Where Does LMS Management Belong? | Portico Learning Solutions
Pingback: Supervising Your Learning and Development | Portico Learning Solutions