What types of images does the phrase “social learning” conjure up for you? Is it an ideal picture of a cross-collaborative office environment? Is it an intimate classroom where each individual is able to conceptualize lessons to apply to his or her environment once they return to their jobs? Or is it an online community of practice where everyone is free to ask any question?
In a report published in 2010 in the journal Ecology and Society titled “What Is Social Learning?” Mark S. Reed and ten co-authors concluded that there is little consensus over the meaning of the term social learning. So how do we know when social learning has occurred or even how to measure its impact in our work environments? Reed and his co-authors maintain that in order for a process to be social learning, it has to:
- Demonstrate a change in understanding at the individual level.
- Show that the change goes beyond the individual and becomes part of a community of practice.
- Take place through interactions within a social network.
By nature people are collaborative, but usually within their own workspace or the context of their organization. As learning leaders, you must continue to ask yourselves how do you create a wider social setting that allows learning to transcend the individual who directly participated in training. And if you want to distinguish the process as being social learning, how do you foster internetwork collaboration that encompasses diversity of thought, a balance of power (neutralizing power so that higher job titles do not have greater authority) and different geographic locations?
Despite the debates that are raging in the learning space, it is my fundamental belief that social learning has little to do with technology itself — technology will continue to evolve. The real catalyst in a social workforce is human behavior or the need to collaborate in a more efficient way. In this case, technology can be a great enabler — but not necessarily a catalyst.
As such, it’s about determining a learning mode and the tools needed to embrace how your workforce wants to absorb and mobilize knowledge. It becomes less about consuming and holding on to that knowledge and more about sharing knowledge. This approach to social learning will surely connect the dots and inspire the innovative thought needed to enact useful differentiated solutions together.
Tammara Combs
Latest posts by Tammara Combs (see all)
- How ‘Wirearchy’ Predates Social Learning - February 9, 2012
- The Evolution of the Virtual Apprenticeship - January 23, 2012
- Organizing a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) - January 6, 2012
Search
Sections
Blog Content
- May 2013 (6)
- April 2013 (8)
- March 2013 (12)
- February 2013 (10)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (9)
- September 2012 (10)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (10)
- June 2012 (13)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (13)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (11)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (9)
- November 2011 (11)
- October 2011 (11)
- September 2011 (13)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (10)
- June 2011 (10)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (12)
- December 2010 (8)
- November 2010 (4)
Tags
alignment business acumen CEO classroom learning CLO collaboration collaborative learning communication e-learning effectiveness efficiency forecasts gen-y generations goal-setting goals impact impact of learning informal learning innovation leadership leadership development learning delivery level 1 level 2 level 3 level 4 LMS measurement metrics and measurement millennials organization goals outcomes Outcome statement plan prioritization ROI senior leaders social learning social workforce society stakeholder stakeholders strategic alignment TDRP



